jas.E. Lindsey v. Smith Bros. Grain

Court of Appeals of Texas

jas.E. Lindsey v. Smith Bros. Grain

287 S.W. 1118

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 21, 1926

DocketNo. 1902.

StatusPublished

This text of 287 S.W. 1118 (jas.E. Lindsey v. Smith Bros. Grain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

jas.E. Lindsey v. Smith Bros. Grain, 287 S.W. 1118 (Tex. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

Appellee sued the appellant for damages occasioned by breach of contract for the sale of a carload of oats, and recovered judgment. The defendant appeals, assigning as error that the evidence is insufficient to establish the contract sued upon, in that the minds of the parties did not meet. This is a question of fact. The trial court found against appellant upon the issue, and the finding is abundantly supported by the evidence. This necessitates affirmance; and it is so ordered. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIGGINS, J.

Appellee sued the appellant for damages occasioned by breach of contract for the sale of a carload of oats, and recovered judgment. The defendant appeals, assigning as error that the evidence is insufficient to establish the contract sued upon, in that the minds of the parties did not meet. This is a question of fact. The trial court found against appellant upon the issue, and the finding is abundantly supported by the evidence. This necessitates affirmance; and it is so ordered. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 S.W. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jase-lindsey-v-smith-bros-grain-texapp-1926.