Jarvis v. Waterbury

32 N.Y.S. 389
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 389 (Jarvis v. Waterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jarvis v. Waterbury, 32 N.Y.S. 389 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on opinion of the judge at special term,

and on the additional ground that the remedy sought should have been by quo warranto. Order affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y.S. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarvis-v-waterbury-nysupct-1895.