Jarvis v. State

110 S.W.2d 1154, 133 Tex. Crim. 361, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 581
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 1937·No. No. 18910.·Published

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction for violating the Texas Liquor Control Act; punishment, a fine of $500.00 and six months confinement in the county jail.

The questions raised upon this appeal are the refusal of the court to quash the indictment because of the failure to negative certain exceptions claimed to be in the statute;-and because of the refusal of the court to submit the question as to whether the inspectors, who bought the liquor alleged to have been sold in violation of law, were accomplices. These questions have been disposed of adversely to appellant in the case of Baker v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 308, and other cases, and in the case of Stevens v. State, No. 18823, opinion this.day handed down (page 333 of this volume).

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jarvis v. State, 110 S.W.2d 1154, 133 Tex. Crim. 361, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 581 (Tex. 1937).

110 S.W.2d 1154 (Jarvis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
106 S.W.2d 308 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)