Jarvis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jarvis v. State

306 S.W.3d 195, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 324, 2010 WL 933727

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

DocketED 92893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 S.W.3d 195 (Jarvis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarvis v. State, 306 S.W.3d 195, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 324, 2010 WL 933727 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Jarvis (Movant) appeals the judgment of the St. Francois County Circuit Court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI