Jarvis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jarvis v. State

92 So. 3d 287, 2012 WL 2864386, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 13, 2012

DocketNo. 5D11-1899

StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 3d 287 (Jarvis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarvis v. State, 92 So. 3d 287, 2012 WL 2864386, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PALMER, J.

Naim Jarvis (defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The judgment incorrectly states that the defendant pled nolo contendere to a third-degree felony when he actually pled to a first-degree misdemeanor.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

JACOBUS, J., and MONACO, D.A., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PALMER, J.

Naim Jarvis (defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The judgment incorrectly states that the defendant pled nolo contendere to a third-degree felony when he actually pled to a first-degree misdemeanor.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

JACOBUS, J., and MONACO, D.A., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 So. 3d 287, 2012 WL 2864386, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarvis-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.