Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners
1938 OK 525, 83 P.2d 560, 183 Okla. 527, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 335
Opinion
The parties to this cause have stipulated that the point at issue here is the same as that decided in Herrin et al. v. Arnold, Judge, No. 28307 (decided July 26, 1938, 183 Okla. 392, 82 P.2d 977), and they have further stipulated that the decision in that case may control the decision in this case. Accordingly the judgment of the district court is affirmed, and the syllabus in cause No. 28307, Herrin et al. v. Arnold, Judge, is adopted as the syllabus in this cause.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners, 1938 OK 525, 83 P.2d 560, 183 Okla. 527, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 335 (Okla. 1938).
1938 OK 525 (Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Opinion No. 76-180 (1976) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports, 1976
State Dry Cleaners' Board v. Compton
1949 OK 78 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1949)
Arnold v. Board of Barber Examiners
109 P.2d 779 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1941)
Schwarze v. Clark
1940 OK 480 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)
Jones v. Bontempo
30 Ohio Law. Abs. 572 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1940)