Jarvis v. Souther

110 S.E.2d 867, 251 N.C. 170, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 539
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 4, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 S.E.2d 867 (Jarvis v. Souther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jarvis v. Souther, 110 S.E.2d 867, 251 N.C. 170, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 539 (N.C. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The first assignment of error set forth in the record of case on appeal is that the trial court erred in the finding of fact and conclusions of law .as contained in the judgment. This is a broadside assignment, and does not bring up for review the findings of fact or the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact. Indeed, while the appeal from the signing of the judgment constitutes an exception to the judgment, it raises two questions only (1) do the facts found support the judgment; and (2) does error of law appear upon the face of the record? A reading of the record indicates that the facts found support the judgment, and that error in law does not appear upon the face of the record.

Hence under authority of Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577, 58 S.E. 2d 351, the judgment from which appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Higgins, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Custody of Orr
119 S.E.2d 880 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E.2d 867, 251 N.C. 170, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarvis-v-souther-nc-1959.