Jarvis v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance

94 S.E.2d 843, 244 N.C. 691, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 507
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 31, 1956·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The burden of proof was upon the plaintiff to show coverage under the quoted provision of the policy. That is, that the deceased was entering the truck at the time of the accident. The evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff shows no more than that Jarvis was in the highway approaching the truck from the rear when run down by the Barrett car and killed. The doors to the truck were closed and undamaged. We must conclude the evidence was insufficient to show the deceased was entering the car at the time of the accident. For that reason, the judgment of the Superior Court of Wilkes County is

Affirmed.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jarvis v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance, 94 S.E.2d 843, 244 N.C. 691, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 507 (N.C. 1956).

94 S.E.2d 843 (Jarvis v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. Baxter
973 A.2d 243 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2009)
Westerfield v. LaFleur
480 So. 2d 973 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Gleason v. Merchants Mutual Insurance
589 F. Supp. 1474 (D. Rhode Island, 1984)
Utica Mutual Insurance v. Contrisciane
473 A.2d 1005 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance Co.
569 S.W.2d 384 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Horn
321 N.E.2d 285 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
Jarvis v. PENNSYLVANIA THRESHERMEN & F. MUT. CAS. INS. CO.
94 S.E.2d 843 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)