Jarvis v. Paper Source

Fourth Circuit

Jarvis v. Paper Source

556 F. App'x 272

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2014·No. No. 13-2368·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint alleging employment discrimination be[273] cause he failed to serve Defendant within 120 days of filing his complaint, in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). We find no abuse of discretion by the district court for dismissing the complaint under Rule 4(m). See Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993) (providing review standard). Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. The Paper Source, No. 1:12-cv-01454-CMH-TRJ (E.D.Va. Oct. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint alleging employment discrimination be[273] cause he failed to serve Defendant within 120 days of filing his complaint, in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). We find no abuse of discretion by the district court for dismissing the complaint under Rule 4(m). See Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993) (providing review standard). Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. The Paper Source, No. 1:12-cv-01454-CMH-TRJ (E.D.Va. Oct. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jarvis v. Paper Source, 556 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

556 F. App'x 272 (Jarvis v. Paper Source) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.