Jarvis v. N. O. Live Stock Commission Co.
This text of 6 Teiss. 368 (Jarvis v. N. O. Live Stock Commission Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff sues to recover the purchase price of a mule bought by him from defendant for rehibitory defects.
His witnesses testify that when the mule was bought, it was sick, that it proved unable to work properly, and, although well fed and cared for, it died a few days afterward of pneumonia.
Letters in the record notify defendant that the mule was not as represented, call for another in its stead, and add that “the mule is in our place of business subject to your orders in our, stable."
The testimony of defendant’s witnesses tends to show that plaintiff, after inspecting, selected the mule, and that it was in good health and condition when delivered.
The district judge found the facts against defendant; his conclusion will stand.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Teiss. 368, 1909 La. App. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarvis-v-n-o-live-stock-commission-co-lactapp-1909.