Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc.

565 U.S. 1105
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 9, 2012·No. No. 11-7009·Published

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dis­missed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeat­[1106]*1106edly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from peti­tioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Mar­tin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc., 565 U.S. 1105 (2012).

565 U.S. 1105 (Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)