Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc.

334 F. App'x 571

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 442 F. App'x 71 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2009·No. No. 09-1299·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek Jarvis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Serv., No. 8:08-cv-01694-DKC (D.Md. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek Jarvis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Serv., No. 8:08-cv-01694-DKC (D.Md. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc., 334 F. App'x 571 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

334 F. App'x 571 (Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.