Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing Co.

331 F. App'x 193
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F. App'x 668
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2009·No. 09-1278, 09-1675, 09-1681, 09-1718·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek Jams seeks to appeal various orders in civil action: the denial of his motion to compel discovery, the denial of his motion for stay, the denial of his motion to recuse the district judge, and the order granting Defendant’s motion to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over- final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain inteiioc-utory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Jarvis seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as this Court lacks jurisdiction. We also deny Jams’ motion for default judgment and for stay pending appeal and Appellee’s motion for sanctions and motion for an extension of time to respond to Jarvis’ motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing Co., 331 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2009).

331 F. App'x 193 (Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services & Leasing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)