Jarvis v. City of Alexandria Mayor's Office

Fourth Circuit

Jarvis v. City of Alexandria Mayor's Office

699 F. App'x 186

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2017·No. No. 17-1780, No. 17-1804, No. 17-1805·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action, dismissing his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), and imposing a pre-filing injunction applicable to future filings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. The City of Alexandria, No. 1:17-cv-00378-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. June 12, 22, 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action, dismissing his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), and imposing a pre-filing injunction applicable to future filings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. The City of Alexandria, No. 1:17-cv-00378-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. June 12, 22, 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jarvis v. City of Alexandria Mayor's Office, 699 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 186 (Jarvis v. City of Alexandria Mayor's Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related