Jarvis v. Christmas Attic

Fourth Circuit

Jarvis v. Christmas Attic

569 F. App'x 183

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2014·No. No. 14-1103·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s January 17, 2014, order denying his motion to file a second amended complaint. Because we affirmed the dismissal of his previous complaint, the time period for filing an amended complaint had expired. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Jarvis’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Appellee’s motion to designate Jarvis as a “vexatious litigant,” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s January 17, 2014, order denying his motion to file a second amended complaint. Because we affirmed the dismissal of his previous complaint, the time period for filing an amended complaint had expired. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Jarvis’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Appellee’s motion to designate Jarvis as a “vexatious litigant,” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jarvis v. Christmas Attic, 569 F. App'x 183 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

569 F. App'x 183 (Jarvis v. Christmas Attic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.