Jarvis v. Christmas Attic
This text of 569 F. App'x 183 (Jarvis v. Christmas Attic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s January 17, 2014, order denying his motion to file a second amended complaint. Because we affirmed the dismissal of his previous complaint, the time period for filing an amended complaint had expired. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Jarvis’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Appellee’s motion to designate Jarvis as a “vexatious litigant,” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 F. App'x 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarvis-v-christmas-attic-ca4-2014.