Jarvis v. California
This text of 291 U.S. 648 (Jarvis v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. McLean, ante, pp. 17, 21-23; Southern Ry. Co. v. King, 217 U.S. 524, 534; Darnell v. Indiana, 226 U.S. 390, 398; Dahnke-Walker Co. v. Bondurant, 257 U.S. 282, 289; Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson, 271 U.S. 50, 54-55; Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers Assn., 276 U.S. 71, 88.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 U.S. 648, 54 S. Ct. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarvis-v-california-scotus-1934.