Jarvis Josephus Canty v. Sheriff David Davis, et al.

• Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
• Decided: January 29, 2026
• Docket: 5:25-cv-00528
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

JARVIS JOSEPHUS CANTY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Case No. 5:25-cv-528-CAR-CHW : SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, et al., : : Defendants. : ________________________________ :

RECOMMENDATION OF DISMISSAL Pending before the Court is a Complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff Jarvis Josephus Canty, an inmate most recently incarcerated at the Bibb County Law Enforcement Center in Macon, Georgia (ECF No. 1). On January 14, 2026, recent correspondence mailed to Plaintiff at the Bibb County LEC was returned to the Court as undeliverable and marked, “Not in Jail Return to Sender.” ECF No. 4 at 1. The Bibb County Sheriff’s Office online inmate search page does not show Plaintiff as a current inmate. See https://inmate.bibbsheriff.us/search [https://perma.cc/V833-76D2A] (searched “Jarvis Canty”) (last visited Jan. 26, 2026). A search of the Georgia Department of Corrections online offender query system likewise fails to show Plaintiff as a current inmate. See https://services.gdc.ga.gov/GDC/OffenderQuery/jsp/OffQryRedirector.jsp [https://perma. cc/FNB3-BBGP] (searched “Canty, Jarvis”) (last accessed Jan. 26, 2026). The Court thus has no knowledge of Plaintiff’s current whereabouts. Plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court informed of his mailing address is a failure to prosecute this action warranting its dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; see also Brown v.

Tallahassee Police Dep't, 205 F. App'x 802, 802 (11th Cir. 2006) (“The court may dismiss an action sua sponte under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute or failure to obey a court order.”) (citing Lopez v. Aransas Cnty. Indep. Sch. Dist., 570 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir. 1978)).1 Moreover, this action simply cannot proceed if the Court does not have a current mailing address for Plaintiff. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice and that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be DENIED as moot. Although it may be an exercise in futility, the Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a copy of this Recommendation to his last known address at the Bibb County LEC. OBJECTIONS Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties may serve and file written objections

to these recommendations with the Honorable C. Ashley Royal, Senior United States District Judge, WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after being served with a copy of this Recommendation. Any objection is limited in length to TWENTY (20) PAGES. See M.D. Ga. L.R. 7.4. The parties may seek an extension of time in which to file written objections, provided a request for an extension is filed prior to the deadline for filing written

objections. Failure to object in accordance with the provisions of § 636(b)(1) waives the

1 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to close of business on September 30, 1981. right to challenge on appeal the district judge’s order based on factual and legal conclusions to which no objection was timely made. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED, this 29th day of January, 2026.

s/ Charles H. Weigle Charles H. Weigle United States Magistrate Judge