Jartran, Inc. v. Abel
This text of 500 So. 2d 638 (Jartran, Inc. v. Abel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Finding no error in the trial court’s entry of Order on Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability, we affirm. Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368 (Fla.1979); see Colon v. Lara, 389 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). At the trial on the issue of damages, plaintiffs must bear their burden of proof against each defendant, and defendants are not precluded from proving their comparative negligence defense. See Davis v. Sobik’s Sandwich Shops, Inc., 351 So.2d 17 (Fla.1977); New Deal Cab Co. v. Stubbs, 90 So.2d 614 (Fla.1956); Stresscon Int’l, Inc. v. Helms, 390 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
500 So. 2d 638, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 136, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jartran-inc-v-abel-fladistctapp-1986.