Jarry v. Walker
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT YORK, ss. Civil Action Docket No. RE-17-0057
MARJORIE & BRYAN JARRY, Plaintiffs
v. ORDER
GARY WALKER, Defendant
A status conference with counsel was held today in connection with plaintiffs'
verified motion for temporary restraining order and injunctive relief filed on August 17, 2017. Plaintiffs have served defendant with a copy of the motion via counsel, and are requesting an evidentiary hearing. The court therefore treats it as a motion for a preliminary injunction. See Clark v. Goodridge, 632 A.2d 125, 126 (Me. 1993). Based upon the conference, it is hereby ordered as follows.
1. The pending motion shall be set for a 1:;6.-hour hearing in York County Superior Court on Wednesday October 4, 2017 starting at 2:00 pm.
2. The parties have identified two witnesses per side. Plaintiffs' witnesses are Marjorie Jarry and Joseph Stanley. Defendant's witnesses are Gary Walker and Dana Libby.
3. Direct testimony of all witnesses shall be presented by way of affidavit.
Counsel shall file and exchange affidavits, together with any exhibits to be introduced, by Friday September 29, 2017.
4. Witnesses shall be present at hearing and available for cross-examination.
Each side will have a combined total of 45 minutes for cross-examination and re-direct
examination of any and all witnesses. If a witness fails to appear at hearing, his or her direct testimony/ affidavit, and all associated exhibits, will be stricken.
The clerk may incorporate this order on the docket by reference pursuant to Rule 79(a). SO ORDERED. DATED: August 18, 2017
RE-17-57 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF: RITAMFARRY DESMOND & RAND PA 55 STROUDWATR ST WESTBROOK ME 04092
ATTORNEYFOR DEFENDANT: JAMES S MUNDY WHITNEY MUNDY & MUNDY PO BOX 187 SOUTH BERWICK ME 03908
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jarry v. Walker (Jarry v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.