Jarry v. Walker

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedAugust 18, 2017
DocketYORre-17-0057
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jarry v. Walker (Jarry v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jarry v. Walker, (Me. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT YORK, ss. Civil Action Docket No. RE-17-0057

MARJORIE & BRYAN JARRY,

Plaintiffs

v. ORDER

GARY WALKER, Defendant

A status conference with counsel was held today in connection with plaintiffs'

verified motion for temporary restraining order and injunctive relief filed on August 17,

2017. Plaintiffs have served defendant with a copy of the motion via counsel, and are

requesting an evidentiary hearing. The court therefore treats it as a motion for a

preliminary injunction. See Clark v. Goodridge, 632 A.2d 125, 126 (Me. 1993). Based

upon the conference, it is hereby ordered as follows.

1. The pending motion shall be set for a 1:;6.-hour hearing in York County

Superior Court on Wednesday October 4, 2017 starting at 2:00 pm.

2. The parties have identified two witnesses per side. Plaintiffs' witnesses are

Marjorie Jarry and Joseph Stanley. Defendant's witnesses are Gary Walker and Dana

Libby.

3. Direct testimony of all witnesses shall be presented by way of affidavit.

Counsel shall file and exchange affidavits, together with any exhibits to be introduced,

by Friday September 29, 2017.

4. Witnesses shall be present at hearing and available for cross-examination.

Each side will have a combined total of 45 minutes for cross-examination and re-direct

1 examination of any and all witnesses. If a witness fails to appear at hearing, his or

her direct testimony/ affidavit, and all associated exhibits, will be stricken.

The clerk may incorporate this order on the docket by reference pursuant to Rule

79(a).

SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 18, 2017

2 RE-17-57 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF: RITAMFARRY DESMOND & RAND PA 55 STROUDWATR ST WESTBROOK ME 04092

ATTORNEYFOR DEFENDANT: JAMES S MUNDY WHITNEY MUNDY & MUNDY PO BOX 187 SOUTH BERWICK ME 03908

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Goodridge
632 A.2d 125 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jarry v. Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarry-v-walker-mesuperct-2017.