Jarrot v. State
168 S.W. 95, 74 Tex. Crim. 500, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 582
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of violating the local
prohibition law, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.
Ho exceptions were reserved to the introduction of testimony; no objections were made to the charge of the court when submitted to counsel, and no special charges were requested. Consequently, the only question presented for a review is the sufficiency of the testimony. The facts and circumstances in evidence fully sustain the verdict and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jarrot v. State, 168 S.W. 95, 74 Tex. Crim. 500, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 582 (Tex. 1914).
168 S.W. 95 (Jarrot v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.