Jarrod W.S. v. Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jarrod W.S. v. Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 2026

Docket167 CA 25-00074

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of Jarrod W.S. v. Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist. (Jarrod W.S. v. Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarrod W.S. v. Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

Jarrod W.S. v Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist. - 2026 NY Slip Op 02746

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Jarrod W.S. v Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist.

2026 NY Slip Op 02746

May 1, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

JARROD W.S. AND MICHELLE A.S., AND JARROD W.S. AND MICHELLE A.S., ON BEHALF OF THEIR INFANT CHILDREN, J.S. AND O.S., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

JORDAN-ELBRIDGE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on May 1, 2026

167 CA 25-00074

Present: Bannister, J.P., Montour, Greenwood, Nowak, And Hannah, JJ.

SMITH PARRY, P.L.L.C., JORDAN (JARROD W. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (RICHARD L. WEBER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Robert E. Antonacci, II, J.), entered January 8, 2025. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs for leave to reargue, for leave to serve a late notice of claim, and for recusal.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is modified in the exercise of discretion by granting the motion in part insofar as it sought leave to serve a late notice of claim with respect to the claims asserted on behalf of J.S., deeming the notice of claim with respect to those claims timely served nunc pro tunc, and reinstating the amended complaint with respect to those claims, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Jarrod W.S. v Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist. ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [May 1, 2026] [4th Dept 2026]).

Entered: May 1, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jarrod W.S. v Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist. - 2026 NY Slip Op 02746

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Jarrod W.S. v Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist.

2026 NY Slip Op 02746

May 1, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

JARROD W.S. AND MICHELLE A.S., AND JARROD W.S. AND MICHELLE A.S., ON BEHALF OF THEIR INFANT CHILDREN, J.S. AND O.S., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

JORDAN-ELBRIDGE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on May 1, 2026

167 CA 25-00074

Present: Bannister, J.P., Montour, Greenwood, Nowak, And Hannah, JJ.

SMITH PARRY, P.L.L.C., JORDAN (JARROD W. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (RICHARD L. WEBER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Robert E. Antonacci, II, J.), entered January 8, 2025. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs for leave to reargue, for leave to serve a late notice of claim, and for recusal.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is modified in the exercise of discretion by granting the motion in part insofar as it sought leave to serve a late notice of claim with respect to the claims asserted on behalf of J.S., deeming the notice of claim with respect to those claims timely served nunc pro tunc, and reinstating the amended complaint with respect to those claims, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Jarrod W.S. v Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist. ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [May 1, 2026] [4th Dept 2026]).

Entered: May 1, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jarrod W.S. v. Jordan-Elbridge Cent. Sch. Dist., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrod-ws-v-jordan-elbridge-cent-sch-dist-nyappdiv-2026.