Jarrod Anthonie Scales v. the State of Texas
This text of Jarrod Anthonie Scales v. the State of Texas (Jarrod Anthonie Scales v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00493-CR
Jarrod Anthonie Scales, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 21-1601-K368 THE HONORABLE SARAH SOELDNER BRUCHMILLER, JUDGE PRESIDING
O R D ER AN D MEMO RAND UM OPIN ION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Jarrod Anthonie Scales’s appointed counsel, Jessica S. Freud, has filed a
motion to withdraw as counsel. In her motion, counsel asserts that good cause exists for her
withdrawal because, although she has nearly completed drafting appellant’s brief, Scales has made
certain demands “regarding the exact contents of [the brief] and the way he wishes that it be filed
with the court, to which counsel cannot agree.”
Indigent defendants are entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal. Cooks v.
State, 240 S.W.3d 906, 910 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). The legislature, however, has given the trial
court the responsibility of appointing counsel in criminal proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
art. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). When counsel is appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant on appeal, it is the trial court’s responsibility to relieve or replace counsel. See Enriquez
v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); Vargas v. State, No. 03-16-00083-
CR, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 6863, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 30, 2016, order) (mem. op., not
designated for publication).
We therefore dismiss counsel’s motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand
the cause to the trial court to hold a hearing in accordance with rule 38.8 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). Upon remand, counsel is instructed to refile
her motion to withdraw, and the trial court shall hold a hearing to determine whether to grant the
motion. In addition, the trial court shall determine whether Scales still wishes to prosecute his
appeal, and if so, the trial court shall make appropriate orders to ensure that appellant is adequately
represented on appeal. See id. A record of the hearing, including copies of all findings and
any orders, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no
later than thirty days from the date of this opinion. See id. R. 34.5(c)(2), .6(d) (authorizing
supplementation of clerk’s and reporter’s records).
It is so ordered on August 15, 2024.
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
Abated and Remanded
Filed: August 15, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jarrod Anthonie Scales v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrod-anthonie-scales-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.