Jarrid Houston v. Cala Campbell

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 2025
DocketA25A2068
StatusPublished

This text of Jarrid Houston v. Cala Campbell (Jarrid Houston v. Cala Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jarrid Houston v. Cala Campbell, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 01, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A2068. JARRID HOUSTON v. CALA CAMPBELL.

On February 21, 2025, the trial court granted petitioner Cala Campbell a 12- month protective order under the Family Violence Act, OCGA § 19-13-1 et seq. Respondent Jarrid Houston filed this direct appeal on March 28, 2025. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, appeals of orders in domestic relations cases — including actions arising under the Family Violence Act — must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b); Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999), disapproved in part on other grounds by Gilliam v. State, 312 Ga. 60, 64 (860 SE2d 543) (2021). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Houston’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal. Second, even if a direct appeal were proper here, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer appellate jurisdiction on this Court. Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012). Houston’s notice of appeal was untimely filed 35 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal. For the above reasons, this untimely direct appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/01/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Perlman v. Perlman
734 S.E.2d 560 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Gilliam v. State
860 S.E.2d 543 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jarrid Houston v. Cala Campbell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrid-houston-v-cala-campbell-gactapp-2025.