Jarrett's Lessee v. West
This text of 1 H. & J. 501 (Jarrett's Lessee v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears that the father of the lessor of the plaintiff had a right of pre-emption in the tract of land called. The Mills of Poverty, under the Lord Proprietary, which the state afterwards recog-nised. That he and Richardson both declared to the witness, that they were interested in the land, and declared eacli other interested at the time. The evidence as being derived from them is not proper to go to the jury.
In the'case of Colston vs. Nicols, decided in this court on the eastern shore, the witness declared he was not interested at the time of the fact, but had become so since. This court decided that his declarations of interest should not deprive the party of his right to his evidence; but this decision was overruled by the court of appeals.
Verdict for the Defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 H. & J. 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarretts-lessee-v-west-vagensess-1804.