Jarrett v. State

89 So. 3d 293, 2012 WL 1956543, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8804
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 2012·No. No. 5D12-529·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PALMER, J.

William H. Jarrett (defendant) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm, writing only to explain why we reject the State’s concession of error.

The State has conceded that the' order should be reversed because the trial court did not attach record documents conclusively refuting the defendant’s claim. However, our supreme court recently explained in Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 & n. 2 (Fla.2011), that rule 3.800(a) does not require the trial court to attach record documents. Rather, “[a]n appellate court should affirm the summary denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion whenever the appellate court’s review of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Id. n. 2.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and MONACO, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jarrett v. State, 89 So. 3d 293, 2012 WL 1956543, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

89 So. 3d 293 (Jarrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tardrick Holiday v. The State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Cox v. State
221 So. 3d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Rodriguez v. State
125 So. 3d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Small v. State
120 So. 3d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Hagans v. State
114 So. 3d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Villar v. State
110 So. 3d 503 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)