Jarrett v. Northcutt

Texas Supreme Court

Jarrett v. Northcutt

592 S.W.2d 930, 23 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 137, 1979 Tex. LEXIS 349

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 19, 1979

DocketB-8856

StatusPublished

Cited by18 cases

This text of 592 S.W.2d 930 (Jarrett v. Northcutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarrett v. Northcutt, 592 S.W.2d 930, 23 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 137, 1979 Tex. LEXIS 349 (Tex. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mary Lou Northcutt Jarrett brought a bill of review action to set aside the property settlement rendered in a prior divorce from her ex-husband, Pat Northcutt. The trial court rendered judgment for Mrs. Jarrett in the bill of review action and ordered a substantial redivision of the property. The court of civil appeals reversed that judgment. 585 S.W.2d 874. In reversing, that court held that Mrs. Jarrett had failed to prove a necessary element of her bill of review. She did not establish that she was without fault or negligence in allowing the prior judgment to become final. The court of civil appeals held that she was required to prove her lack of negligence, in spite of the fact that her waiver of process was invalidly executed. In this regard, the decision of the court of civil appeals conflicts with the decision of the court of civil appeals in Deen v. Deen, 530 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1975, no writ).

We conclude that, in order to prevail, the plaintiff in a bill of review action must prove his/her lack of fault or negli *931 gence in permitting a meritorious defense to go unasserted in a prior action. Cf. McEwen v. Harrison, 162 Tex. 125, 345 S.W.2d 706, 710 (1961). Accordingly, we disapprove of the holding of Deen v. Deen, supra. The application for writ of error in this case is refused, no reversible error. Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mary Lou Northcutt Jarrett brought a bill of review action to set aside the property settlement rendered in a prior divorce from her ex-husband, Pat Northcutt. The trial court rendered judgment for Mrs. Jarrett in the bill of review action and ordered a substantial redivision of the property. The court of civil appeals reversed that judgment. 585 S.W.2d 874. In reversing, that court held that Mrs. Jarrett had failed to prove a necessary element of her bill of review. She did not establish that she was without fault or negligence in allowing the prior judgment to become final. The court of civil appeals held that she was required to prove her lack of negligence, in spite of the fact that her waiver of process was invalidly executed. In this regard, the decision of the court of civil appeals conflicts with the decision of the court of civil appeals in Deen v. Deen, 530 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Civ.App.—Fort Worth 1975, no writ).

We conclude that, in order to prevail, the plaintiff in a bill of review action must prove his/her lack of fault or negli *931 gence in permitting a meritorious defense to go unasserted in a prior action. Cf. McEwen v. Harrison, 162 Tex. 125, 345 S.W.2d 706, 710 (1961). Accordingly, we disapprove of the holding of Deen v. Deen, supra. The application for writ of error in this case is refused, no reversible error. Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 S.W.2d 930, 23 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 137, 1979 Tex. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrett-v-northcutt-tex-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack