Jarrett v. City of Asheville
This text of 199 N.C. 521 (Jarrett v. City of Asheville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbis is a companion case to Green v. Asheville, ante, 516, and is controlled by wbat was said in tbat case, tbe only dis-tinguisbment in tbe fact situations of tbe two eases being tbat in tbe present case the plaintiff resides in wbat was formerly tbe town of Bilt-more, while tbe plaintiff in tbe Green case resides in wbat was formerly tbe town of Kenilworth. Tbe charters of both towns, Biltmore and Kenilworth, were repealed by tbe Greater Asheville Extension Act, and tbe city of Asheville thereupon assumed all outstanding obligations and liabilities of said towns and succeeded to all their assets, revenues, taxes, assessments, etc.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 N.C. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrett-v-city-of-asheville-nc-1930.