Jarrell v. Vincent

Supreme Court of Georgia

Jarrell v. Vincent

35 S.E. 636, 111 Ga. 822, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 758

DecidedApril 10, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 35 S.E. 636 (Jarrell v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarrell v. Vincent, 35 S.E. 636, 111 Ga. 822, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 758 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Fish, J.

The testamentary scheme manifested by the will now under review was, in all material particulars, similar to that set forth in the will considered in Ezell v. Head, 99 Ga. 560; and under the facts now-appearing the questions involved are substantially the same as those dealt with in the case cited. Consequently, the decision therein rendered is, in principle, controlling in the case now before the court; and the conclusion results that the judgment now excepted to was right.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fish, J.

The testamentary scheme manifested by the will now under review was, in all material particulars, similar to that set forth in the will considered in Ezell v. Head, 99 Ga. 560; and under the facts now-appearing the questions involved are substantially the same as those dealt with in the case cited. Consequently, the decision therein rendered is, in principle, controlling in the case now before the court; and the conclusion results that the judgment now excepted to was right.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 S.E. 636, 111 Ga. 822, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrell-v-vincent-ga-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack