JARRARD v. Wildes
This text of 71 S.E.2d 549 (JARRARD v. Wildes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Neither the application for the processioning of an alleged disputed land line nor the protest thereto make a case “respecting title to land,” nor does the case otherwise come within the jurisdiction of this court, and, accordingly, it must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Code (Ann.), §§ 2-3704, 2-3708; Elkins v. Merritt, 146 Ga. 647 (92 S. E. 51); Pearre v. Wilkinson, 181 Ga. 619 (183 S. E. 626); Edenfield v. Lanier, 203 Ga. 348 (46 S. E. 2d, 582); Ledford v. Hill, 206 Ga. 304 (57 S. E. 2d, 77).
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 S.E.2d 549, 209 Ga. 282, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrard-v-wildes-ga-1952.