JARRARD v. Wildes
Opinion
Neither the application for the processioning of an alleged disputed land line nor the protest thereto make a case “respecting title to land,” nor does the case otherwise come within the jurisdiction of this court, and, accordingly, it must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Code (Ann.), §§ 2-3704, 2-3708; Elkins v. Merritt, 146 Ga. 647 (92 S. E. 51); Pearre v. Wilkinson, 181 Ga. 619 (183 S. E. 626); Edenfield v. Lanier, 203 Ga. 348 (46 S. E. 2d, 582); Ledford v. Hill, 206 Ga. 304 (57 S. E. 2d, 77).
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
71 S.E.2d 549 (JARRARD v. Wildes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.