JARRARD v. Wildes

71 S.E.2d 549, 209 Ga. 282, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 460
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1952·No. 17927·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Neither the application for the processioning of an alleged disputed land line nor the protest thereto make a case “respecting title to land,” nor does the case otherwise come within the jurisdiction of this court, and, accordingly, it must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Code (Ann.), §§ 2-3704, 2-3708; Elkins v. Merritt, 146 Ga. 647 (92 S. E. 51); Pearre v. Wilkinson, 181 Ga. 619 (183 S. E. 626); Edenfield v. Lanier, 203 Ga. 348 (46 S. E. 2d, 582); Ledford v. Hill, 206 Ga. 304 (57 S. E. 2d, 77).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JARRARD v. Wildes, 71 S.E.2d 549, 209 Ga. 282, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 460 (Ga. 1952).

71 S.E.2d 549 (JARRARD v. Wildes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. Tallent
218 S.E.2d 799 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Fulford v. Johnson
144 S.E.2d 526 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Sanders v. Calloway
87 S.E.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
State v. Walker
74 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)