Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.

925 F.3d 605
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2019
Docket17-3695
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 925 F.3d 605 (Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp., 925 F.3d 605 (3d Cir. 2019).

Opinion

Theodore A. McKee, Circuit Judge

Having been submitted to the remaining judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that *606 the petition for rehearing by the panel filed by the appellee in the above-entitled case is granted. The opinion and judgment entered December 26, 2018 are hereby vacated. The merits panel is reconstituted in light of the retirement of the Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie. The Honorable Paul B. Matey replaces Judge Vanaskie on the merits panel.

As the merits panel has granted panel rehearing, no further action will be taken by the en banc court. The parties may file a new petition for rehearing after disposition of the matter by the reconstituted merits panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NOVAK v. TORCON, INC.
E.D. Pennsylvania, 2025
Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp
962 F.3d 701 (Third Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
925 F.3d 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaroslawicz-v-mt-bank-corp-ca3-2019.