Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Jaros v. Floersheimer

Jaros v. Floersheimer

5 A.D.2d 986, 173 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6104
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 29, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 A.D.2d 986 (Jaros v. Floersheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaros v. Floersheimer, 5 A.D.2d 986, 173 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Judgment so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed; and the plaintiff-respondent and the defendant-respondent, Thomas J. Hughes Construction Co., Inc. recover of the defendant-appellant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., the costs of this appeal; and the third-party defendant-respondent, J. Harry McNally Mason Corp. recover of the third-party plaintiff-appellant, Thomas J. Hughes Construction Co., Inc. the costs of this appeal. No opinion.

Concur — Frank, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briarpatch Ltd, L.P. v. Frankfurt Garbus Klein & Selz, P.C.
13 A.D.3d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.2d 986, 173 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaros-v-floersheimer-nyappdiv-1958.