Jaros v. Floersheimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jaros v. Floersheimer

5 A.D.2d 986, 173 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6104

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed; and the plaintiff-respondent and the defendant-respondent, Thomas J. Hughes Construction Co., Inc. recover of the defendant-appellant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., the costs of this appeal; and the third-party defendant-respondent, J. Harry McNally Mason Corp. recover of the third-party plaintiff-appellant, Thomas J. Hughes Construction Co., Inc. the costs of this appeal. No opinion.

Concur — Frank, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed; and the plaintiff-respondent and the defendant-respondent, Thomas J. Hughes Construction Co., Inc. recover of the defendant-appellant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., the costs of this appeal; and the third-party defendant-respondent, J. Harry McNally Mason Corp. recover of the third-party plaintiff-appellant, Thomas J. Hughes Construction Co., Inc. the costs of this appeal. No opinion.

Concur — Frank, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Jaros v. Floersheimer, 5 A.D.2d 986, 173 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

5 A.D.2d 986 (Jaros v. Floersheimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related