Jaros v. City of Niagara Falls
This text of 221 A.D.2d 1024 (Jaros v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of respondent, the City of Niagara Falls, to dismiss the petition on the ground that the proceeding was not timely commenced (see, Matter of Comerford v City of Niagara Falls, 214 AD2d 1055; Matter of Fabrizio v City of Niagara Falls, 214 AD2d 1055; Matter of Westendorf v City of Niagara Falls, 214 AD2d 1056). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.2d 1024, 635 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaros-v-city-of-niagara-falls-nyappdiv-1995.