Jarmillo v. State
This text of 295 S.E.2d 558 (Jarmillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On appeal from his convictions for obstructing an officer and simple battery, the defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient.
Two officers testified that they arrived at the defendant’s house in response to a child-abuse complaint and were invited in by the defendant’s wife. A short time later the defendant entered the room, became enraged, and demanded that the officers leave. The defendant’s wife, according to the officers, indicated that they should stay. At this point, the defendant grabbed the collar of one of the officers and tore his tie off. Held:
The evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally Boyd v. State, 244 Ga. 130 (5) (259 SE2d 71) (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 S.E.2d 558, 163 Ga. App. 588, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarmillo-v-state-gactapp-1982.