Jarmel v. Jarmel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jarmel v. Jarmel

641 So. 2d 926, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7667, 1994 WL 397602

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 3, 1994

DocketNo. 93-00433

StatusPublished

This text of 641 So. 2d 926 (Jarmel v. Jarmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarmel v. Jarmel, 641 So. 2d 926, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7667, 1994 WL 397602 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Glen Jarmel appeals and Leslie Jarmel cross appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Leslie Jarmel is entitled to special equity in the marital residence in the amount of $34,000. Leslie Jarmel obtained a portion of this amount from proceeds of the sale of a home she owned prior to the marriage and she invested it in the acquisition of the marital residence. See § 61.075(5)(b)(l), Fla.Stat. (1991). She acquired the remainder of this amount from an award of a personal injury settlement and also invested it in the acquisition of the marital residence. See Brogdon v. Brogdon, 530 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

We reverse the final judgment of dissolution and remand to permit the trial court to amend its final judgment to award to Leslie Jarmel special equity in the marital residence in the amount of $34,000. We otherwise affirm the final judgment.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Glen Jarmel appeals and Leslie Jarmel cross appeals the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Leslie Jarmel is entitled to special equity in the marital residence in the amount of $34,000. Leslie Jarmel obtained a portion of this amount from proceeds of the sale of a home she owned prior to the marriage and she invested it in the acquisition of the marital residence. See § 61.075(5)(b)(l), Fla.Stat. (1991). She acquired the remainder of this amount from an award of a personal injury settlement and also invested it in the acquisition of the marital residence. See Brogdon v. Brogdon, 530 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

We reverse the final judgment of dissolution and remand to permit the trial court to amend its final judgment to award to Leslie Jarmel special equity in the marital residence in the amount of $34,000. We otherwise affirm the final judgment.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 So. 2d 926, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7667, 1994 WL 397602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarmel-v-jarmel-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack