Jarez v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jarez v. Travis

265 A.D.2d 708, 696 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10693

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 708 (Jarez v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarez v. Travis, 265 A.D.2d 708, 696 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Board of Parole which denied petitioner’s request for parole.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner, a prison inmate, has reappeared before the State Board of Parole since the parole release hearing giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole was again denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Keating v New York State Div. of Parole, 252 AD2d 635).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Board of Parole which denied petitioner’s request for parole.

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner, a prison inmate, has reappeared before the State Board of Parole since the parole release hearing giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole was again denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Keating v New York State Div. of Parole, 252 AD2d 635).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 708, 696 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarez-v-travis-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack