Jared William Mayville v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 19, 2008
Docket03-08-00047-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jared William Mayville v. State (Jared William Mayville v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jared William Mayville v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00443-CV

Jay Sandon Cooper, Appellant

v.

County of Travis; Austin Independent School District; City of Austin; Travis County Healthcare District; Austin Community College District; and William B. Cochran, Court Appointed Receiver/Trustee, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GV-99-009504, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jay Sandon Cooper has filed a motion for extension of time to file his

appellate brief, informing this Court that he has filed for bankruptcy protection (United States

Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, case number 08-42689). Accordingly, his appeal is stayed. See

11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 (“A bankruptcy suspends the appeal and all periods in these

rules from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates or severs

the appeal in accordance with federal law.”). During the bankruptcy stay, all deadlines and processes

in this Court are suspended, and upon reinstatement, time lines will begin to run anew from

the date of reinstatement. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Thus, we may not and need not rule on

appellant’s motion for extension of time, see id.; Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.,

751 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Tex. 1988) (state court action during bankruptcy is void), and we abate the

appeal while the bankruptcy stay is in place. Any party may file a motion to reinstate upon the occurrence of an event that would

allow the appeal to proceed. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the

automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding will result in the dismissal of the case

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Bankruptcy

Filed: November 19, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.
751 S.W.2d 499 (Texas Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jared William Mayville v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jared-william-mayville-v-state-texapp-2008.