Jardine Emett & Chandler New York, Inc. v. Armored Transport
This text of 204 A.D.2d 606 (Jardine Emett & Chandler New York, Inc. v. Armored Transport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover insurance premiums due and owing, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated October 14, 1992, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of res judicata.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The action was properly dismissed on the ground of res judicata, because it was identical to a prior action that was dismissed because of the plaintiff’s failure to comply with a conditional order of preclusion (see, Strange v Montefiore Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 59 NY2d 737; Barrett v Kasko Constr. Co., 56 NY2d 830; Leeds v Sturm, Ruger & Co., 101 AD2d 881). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 606, 612 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jardine-emett-chandler-new-york-inc-v-armored-transport-nyappdiv-1994.