Jarczynski v. McNab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jarczynski v. McNab

96 A.D.2d 919, 465 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19546

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 919 (Jarczynski v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarczynski v. McNab, 96 A.D.2d 919, 465 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Gerard J. Jarczynski and Virginia Jarczynski as candidates in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 13, 1983, for the office of Member of the Republican County Committee, 73rd Election District, Town of Huntington, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), dated August 18,1983, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner conceded that the error in designating the election district in the subscribing witness’ statement invalidated sheet number three. However, sheet number one of the petition was properly upheld, since the date on the subscribing witness’ statement contained no material “alteration”. Thus, having sufficient signatures, petitioner’s application to validate the designating petition was properly granted. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Gerard J. Jarczynski and Virginia Jarczynski as candidates in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 13, 1983, for the office of Member of the Republican County Committee, 73rd Election District, Town of Huntington, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), dated August 18,1983, which granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner conceded that the error in designating the election district in the subscribing witness’ statement invalidated sheet number three. However, sheet number one of the petition was properly upheld, since the date on the subscribing witness’ statement contained no material “alteration”. Thus, having sufficient signatures, petitioner’s application to validate the designating petition was properly granted. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 919, 465 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarczynski-v-mcnab-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack