Jarboe v. Kepler
This text of 8 Ind. 314 (Jarboe v. Kepler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Several errors are assigned, but in argument all of them seem to be abandoned but one. That relates to a question of evideneel
"When the plaip-tifF closed, the defendant introduced one Kepler. But the bill of exceptions does not disclose what this witness testified; nor does the record purport to contain all the evidence. It simply says [315]*315Kepler was examined as a witness in behalf of the defense. On the cross-examination a conversation between him and one Fostep was called out. All we learn is, that “the conversation related to the subject-matter of the suit.” Foster was-'then called, more, it would seem, to give fuller details of that conversation, than to contradict Kepler. To this the defendant excepted, &e.
Held, that to contradict a witness with a view to impeach his credibility, the proper foundation, by examining Kepler and calling his attention to the time, place, person, and circumstances, must first be laid. Doe v. Reagan, 5 Blackf. 217, and the authorities cited, and note.
Held, further, that as the evidence is not all in the record, and there is no special case made and reserved under the 347th section, 2 E. S. p. 116, the record presents no question for our consideration.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ind. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarboe-v-kepler-ind-1856.