Jarashow v. Emery
157 A.D. 894, 142 N.Y.S. 1124
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1913
StatusPublished
This text of 157 A.D. 894 (Jarashow v. Emery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jarashow v. Emery, 157 A.D. 894, 142 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that plaintiff has not shown complete performance, and has not sustained his burden of proof as to substantial performance because he has not shown the value of the omitted work. Thomas, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred ; Jenks, P. J., and Putnam, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
157 A.D. 894, 142 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarashow-v-emery-nyappdiv-1913.