Jaramillo v. City of Coral Gables

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jaramillo v. City of Coral Gables

436 So. 2d 1087, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22796

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 6, 1983

DocketNos. 82-1923, 82-2103

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 436 So. 2d 1087 (Jaramillo v. City of Coral Gables) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jaramillo v. City of Coral Gables, 436 So. 2d 1087, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22796 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dade County, by a master plan adopted under authority of the so-called Home Rule Amendment to the Florida Constitution, has undertaken total control of traffic both in the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county, thereby relieving the municipalities of responsibility for damages resulting from faulty or defective traffic control devices. See A.L. Lewis Elementary School v. Metropolitan Dade County, 376 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dade County, by a master plan adopted under authority of the so-called Home Rule Amendment to the Florida Constitution, has undertaken total control of traffic both in the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county, thereby relieving the municipalities of responsibility for damages resulting from faulty or defective traffic control devices. See A.L. Lewis Elementary School v. Metropolitan Dade County, 376 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 So. 2d 1087, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaramillo-v-city-of-coral-gables-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack