Jaradat v. Lynch
This text of 670 F. App'x 155 (Jaradat v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Isam Jaradat petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed Jaradat’s claims and conclude that they are without merit. We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Bogrd. In re Jaradat, 2016 WL 946713 (B.I.A. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaradat-v-lynch-ca4-2016.