Jaqualeyn Demond Goodwin v. State of Arkansas
This text of 2020 Ark. App. 402 (Jaqualeyn Demond Goodwin v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 402 Reason: I attest to the accuracy ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS and integrity of this document Date: 2021-07-08 15:26:10 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: DIVISION I 9.7.5 No. CR-20-49
Opinion Delivered September 16, 2020 JAQUALEYN DEMOND GOODWIN APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 23CR-18-721] V.
HONORABLE CHARLES E. STATE OF ARKANSAS CLAWSON, JR., JUDGE
APPELLEE APPEAL DISMISSED
N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Judge
Appellant Jaqualeyn Demond Goodwin was on probation for forgery when the State
filed a petition to revoke, alleging that Goodwin violated the conditions of his probation.
At the hearing on the petition, Goodwin entered a guilty plea, admitting that he had failed
to report as ordered and tested positive for drugs. The circuit court entered a sentencing
order pursuant to the guilty plea and sentenced Goodwin to three years in prison. Goodwin
filed a timely notice of appeal. Because we lack jurisdiction over the appeal of this guilty
plea, we dismiss the appeal.
As a general rule, one may not appeal from an order entered pursuant to a guilty
plea. Burgess v. State, 2016 Ark. 175, 490 S.W.3d 645. The rule applies equally to pleas
entered to revocation petitions. See McJoy v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 337. Essentially, there
are three exceptions to the general rule: (1) when one enters a conditional guilty plea and
retains the right to argue one of the specific issues in Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b); (2) when there is a challenge to evidence presented in a sentencing hearing separate from the plea
itself; and (3) when the assignment of error is from a sentence or sentencing procedure that
was not an integral part of the acceptance of the plea. Id. We find nothing in this record
that would bring Goodwin’s case within any of the exceptions to the general rule of
nonappealability of a guilty plea. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Bates v. State, 2017
Ark. App. 11.
Appeal dismissed.
HARRISON and HIXSON, JJ., agree.
Terry Goodwin Jones, for appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: David L. Eanes, Jr., Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 Ark. App. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaqualeyn-demond-goodwin-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2020.