Jaqualeyn Demond Goodwin v. State of Arkansas

2020 Ark. App. 402
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 16, 2020
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 Ark. App. 402 (Jaqualeyn Demond Goodwin v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaqualeyn Demond Goodwin v. State of Arkansas, 2020 Ark. App. 402 (Ark. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 402 Reason: I attest to the accuracy ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS and integrity of this document Date: 2021-07-08 15:26:10 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: DIVISION I 9.7.5 No. CR-20-49

Opinion Delivered September 16, 2020 JAQUALEYN DEMOND GOODWIN APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 23CR-18-721] V.

HONORABLE CHARLES E. STATE OF ARKANSAS CLAWSON, JR., JUDGE

APPELLEE APPEAL DISMISSED

N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Judge

Appellant Jaqualeyn Demond Goodwin was on probation for forgery when the State

filed a petition to revoke, alleging that Goodwin violated the conditions of his probation.

At the hearing on the petition, Goodwin entered a guilty plea, admitting that he had failed

to report as ordered and tested positive for drugs. The circuit court entered a sentencing

order pursuant to the guilty plea and sentenced Goodwin to three years in prison. Goodwin

filed a timely notice of appeal. Because we lack jurisdiction over the appeal of this guilty

plea, we dismiss the appeal.

As a general rule, one may not appeal from an order entered pursuant to a guilty

plea. Burgess v. State, 2016 Ark. 175, 490 S.W.3d 645. The rule applies equally to pleas

entered to revocation petitions. See McJoy v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 337. Essentially, there

are three exceptions to the general rule: (1) when one enters a conditional guilty plea and

retains the right to argue one of the specific issues in Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b); (2) when there is a challenge to evidence presented in a sentencing hearing separate from the plea

itself; and (3) when the assignment of error is from a sentence or sentencing procedure that

was not an integral part of the acceptance of the plea. Id. We find nothing in this record

that would bring Goodwin’s case within any of the exceptions to the general rule of

nonappealability of a guilty plea. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Bates v. State, 2017

Ark. App. 11.

Appeal dismissed.

HARRISON and HIXSON, JJ., agree.

Terry Goodwin Jones, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: David L. Eanes, Jr., Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgess v. State
2016 Ark. 175 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2016)
McJoy v. State
2016 Ark. App. 337 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2016)
Bates v. State
2017 Ark. App. 11 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ark. App. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaqualeyn-demond-goodwin-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2020.