Japo v. State

221 So. 3d 1205, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17097, 2016 WL 6800877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2016·No. No. 3D16-2138·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion the trial court’s" order denying Pablo Japo’s motion to correct illegal sentence.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Further, Pablo Japo has filed numerous postconviction appeals regarding his conviction and sentence in lower tribunal case No. 90-29389C. Our preliminary review of those prior postconviction proceedings evidences that Japo has engaged in the filing of appeals on claims that were successive, time-barred, or otherwise wholly without merit. We therefore order Pablo Japo, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, to file a response and to show cause why this court should not prohibit him from submitting further pro se appeals, petitions, motions or other pleadings regarding case number 99-293890, unless such pleadings are signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Japo v. State, 221 So. 3d 1205, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17097, 2016 WL 6800877 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

221 So. 3d 1205 (Japo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.