Japna, Inc. v. Selfx Innovations Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 20, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-10753·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK oo DOCH Plaintiff, -against- Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-10753-ALC

CLAUDIA ORTIZ, TULIP APPARELS LLC, TULIP CREATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, SELFX INNOVATIONS INC. a.k.a. FASHINZA, SELFX INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, LUNA SKIES, LLC, SMARTH GUPTA, SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA, ABHISHEK SHARMA, PAWAN GUPTA, Defendants. +--+ X

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE AGREEMENT AND ORDER 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to the following Stipulated Protective Agreement and Order (“Stipulated Protective Order”). The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). This agreement does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery. This agreement affords protection from public disclosure and use that extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential material or information under seal.

2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT

This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than the prosecution, defense or attempted settlement of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, trade secrets, including methods, techniques, processes, technical plans and technical specifications; confidential business or financial information relating to sales, manufacturing, customers, vendors, personnel, market- share, pricing, revenue, profit, and economic injury; information regarding confidential business practices and strategic plans, or other confidential research, development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties); information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. The public disclosure of such information would cause material, irreparable harm to the parties because

it would provide competitors and potential competitors in the marketplace with information about the parties' plans, operations, technology, and finances. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been

2 maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 3. DEFINITIONS

3.1. Action: JAPNA, Inc. v. Claudia Ortiz, et al., Case No. Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-

10753-ALC.

3.2. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.

3.3. "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION" shall mean all Documents,

Communications, and Testimony, and all information contained therein, and other information designated as confidential, if such Documents or Testimony contain trade secrets, proprietary business information, competitively sensitive information or other information the disclosure of which would, in the good faith judgment of the Party or, as appropriate, non-party designating the material as confidential, be detrimental to the conduct of that Party’s or non-party’s business or the business of any of that Party’s or non-party’s customers or clients. 3.4. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support

staff).

3.5. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that

it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." 3.6. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 3 3.7. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

the Action who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 3.8. Retained Consultant: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a

matter pertinent to the Action who (1) has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action, (2) is not a current employee of a Party’s competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor. 3.9. "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY": shall mean any

"Confidential Information" that is of such a private, sensitive, competitive or proprietary nature that present disclosure to persons other than those identified in paragraph 6.3 below would reasonably be expected to cause irreparable harm or materially impair the legitimate competitive position or interests of the Designating Party. A designation of Confidential Information as Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only Information constitutes a representation that such Confidential Information has been reviewed by an attorney for the Designating Party and that there is a valid basis for such a designation. 3.10. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.

3.11. Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal

entity not named as a Party to this action.

3.12. Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this

Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action 4 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 3.13. Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

consultants, retained experts, in-house counsel, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 3.14. Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this Action.

3.15. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support

services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 3.16. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Japna, Inc. v. Selfx Innovations Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Japna, Inc. v. Selfx Innovations Inc. (Japna, Inc. v. Selfx Innovations Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)