Japan-Atlantic & Gulf Freight Conference v. United States

345 U.S. 975
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 8, 1953
DocketNo. 718; No. 774
StatusPublished

This text of 345 U.S. 975 (Japan-Atlantic & Gulf Freight Conference v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Japan-Atlantic & Gulf Freight Conference v. United States, 345 U.S. 975 (1953).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The motions in No. 718 for a stay and to advance, and for leave to file brief of A/S J. Lud[976]*976wig Mowinckels Rederi and others, as amici curiae, are denied. Certiorari denied.

Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk and George F. Galland for petitioners in No. 718. Francis T. Greene and Joseph A. Klausner for petitioner in No. 774. Acting Solicitor General Stern and Ralph S. Spritzer for the United States, respondent. John J. O’Connor, Thurman Arnold, Paul A. Porter and William L. McGovern for Isbrandtsen Co., Inc., respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 U.S. 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/japan-atlantic-gulf-freight-conference-v-united-states-scotus-1953.