J.A.O. v. State
This text of 549 So. 2d 1124 (J.A.O. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J.A.O., a juvenile, appeals an adjudication of delinquency. He alleges error in the exclusion of testimony about previous altercations with the victim, offered in support of his claim of self-defense to a battery.
Finding that the excluded testimony was central to J.A.O.’s claim of self-defense, E.B. v. State, 531 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), and that evidence of prior encounters between the victim and defendant was relevant, Barnes v. State, 406 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), review denied, 413 So.2d 877 (Fla.1982), and admissible, White v. State, 59 Fla. 53, 52 So, 805 (1910), we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 So. 2d 1124, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2401, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5641, 1989 WL 118916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jao-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.