JAO Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky
8 N.Y.3d 939
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in JAO Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 N.Y.3d 144 →
Opinion
J.A.O. ACQUISITION CORP. et al., Appellants,
v.
JEFFREY D. STAVITSKY et al., Defendants, and
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, Formerly Known as CORESTATES BANK, N.A., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Motion for reargument denied [see 8 NY3d 144].
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JAO Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky, 8 N.Y.3d 939 (N.Y. 2007).
8 N.Y.3d 939 (JAO Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky
863 N.E.2d 585 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)