January v. State

732 S.W.2d 632, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 519
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 1987
Docket832-85
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 732 S.W.2d 632 (January v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
January v. State, 732 S.W.2d 632, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 519 (Tex. 1987).

Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIUM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of attempted capital murder. The jury assessed punishment at 50 years imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections. On appeal to the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals, appellant’s conviction was reversed and the indictment was ordered dismissed on the grounds that appellant’s rights against double jeopardy had been violated. January v. State, 695 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1985). The State petitioned this Court for discretionary review, contesting preservation of and alleging waiver of jeopardy error, and also contesting the merits of the Court of Appeals’ opinion on the resolution of the jeopardy issue. We granted review on only that portion of the State’s petition dealing with the merits of the double jeopardy claim. The grant was pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 200(b)(2), which states that we may review a decision where:

"... a court of appeals has decided an important question of state or federal law which has not been, but should be, settled by ... [this Court].”

We have reviewed that part of the Court of Appeals’ opinion dealing with the merits of the jeopardy issue * and find it to be sound. See May v. State, 726 S.W.2d 573 (Tex.Cr.App.1987). We therefore adopt that part of the opinion as our own, without further comment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

*

January, supra at 220, Column 2, Line 2 to end.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Hawkins
6 S.W.3d 554 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Robinson v. State
841 S.W.2d 392 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Cook v. State
840 S.W.2d 384 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Schalk v. State
823 S.W.2d 633 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Mixon v. State
804 S.W.2d 107 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Garcia v. State
806 S.W.2d 835 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Ex Parte Herron
790 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Keith v. State
782 S.W.2d 861 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Ladner v. State
780 S.W.2d 247 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Rubino v. Lynaugh
770 S.W.2d 802 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Rakestraw v. State
765 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Simmons v. State
745 S.W.2d 348 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 S.W.2d 632, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/january-v-state-texcrimapp-1987.