January v. Johnson County
This text of 13 F. Cas. 362 (January v. Johnson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the act in which this section is found does not profess in its title or body to be a curative act, and as when comparing this act with the act of 1872 which it amended, it appears to have [363]*363been the purpose of section 7 to change the mode of levying and collecting the taxes, it is my opinion that it was not intended to have, and does not have, the effect to make binding upon the county, bonds which would otherwise be void. Demurrer overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 F. Cas. 362, 3 Dill. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/january-v-johnson-county-circtdks-1874.